From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: cast result of copyNode() |
Date: | 2017-03-07 23:34:15 |
Message-ID: | 10066.1488929655@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> You appear to be using a #define macro to wrap a function of the same name
> with the code:
> #define copyObject(obj) ((typeof(obj)) copyObject(obj))
> I don't necessarily have a problem with that, but it struck me as a bit odd, and
> grep'ing through the sources, I don't see anywhere else in the project where that
> is done for a function of the same number of arguments, and only one other
> place where it is done at all:
I agree that that seems like a bad idea. Better to rename the underlying
function --- for one thing, that provides an "out" if some caller doesn't
want this behavior.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-07 23:41:05 | Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2017-03-07 23:31:27 | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |