From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sherwood Robinson <srobinson(at)fredericksburg(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Should Cygwin PostgreSQL contain all header files? |
Date: | 2001-06-08 16:40:47 |
Message-ID: | 10047.992018447@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-general |
Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> The bottom line is should I be using
> make -C src/include install-all-headers
> instead of
> make -C src/include install
> or is PoPy's use of non-client-side headers incorrect?
If PoPy is client-side code and not something that loads into the
server, then I'd discourage it from using any headers that are not
installed by default in 7.1. Which headers are in question here,
and what breaks if you don't include them?
As for your more general question, what you need to answer is whether
you expect users of the Cygwin distribution to be doing server-side
code development. If they are, they'll want the full header tree.
Otherwise it's just clutter.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-06-08 18:08:49 | Re: [GENERAL] Should Cygwin PostgreSQL contain all header files? |
Previous Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-06-07 18:23:29 | Should Cygwin PostgreSQL contain all header files? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-08 16:47:54 | Re: [GENERAL] REPOST: redefining location of the socket file /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432 |
Previous Message | Julien Jehannet | 2001-06-08 16:35:06 | Re: Re: why unsigned numbers don't exist ? |