From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability |
Date: | 2002-04-03 16:57:26 |
Message-ID: | 10037.1017853046@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> That said, I'd like to block some spam myself. I'd rather find a spam
> list which doesn't already have me disallowed however...
In case it makes you feel better: my *own* address was on the 510sg list
for awhile last month. But I still use the list ;-). Nothing to stop
you from using some less-aggressive list though; see
http://relays.osirusoft.com/ for links to a dozen or more possibilities.
In practice, any DNSBL list can cause denial-of-service problems.
(The original and still most conservatively run one, MAPS RBL, had a
memorable episode where someone put 127.0.0.1 into the blacklist for
a few hours...) I deal with this by installing local whitelist
exceptions for people I talk to regularly. Otherwise, there's always
the mailing lists.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-04-03 17:00:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Suggestions please: names for function cachability |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-03 16:54:20 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-04-03 17:00:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Suggestions please: names for function cachability |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-03 16:54:20 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability |