Re: alternative to PG_CATCH

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alternative to PG_CATCH
Date: 2018-12-13 15:01:37
Message-ID: 10030.1544713297@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> But the block inside parentheses feels kinda funny, doesn't it?

+1. I think this is a good concept, but let's put in enough effort to
not require weird syntax.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-12-13 15:05:42 Re: BUG #15548: Unaccent does not remove combining diacritical characters
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-12-13 14:05:40 Re: Reorganize collation lookup time and place