| From: | Tony Grant <tony(at)animaproductions(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net |
| Cc: | jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Serialize |
| Date: | 2001-10-05 13:33:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1002288811.13141.85.camel@tonux |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 14:57, Dave Cramer wrote:
> While fixing the handling of "unknown" data type in the result set I was
> faced with wading through the Serialize code.
>
> I am wondering if this is really a required/desireable feature?
>
> How many people out there are actually using it?
>
> Do we need/want it?
>
> My thoughts are:
>
> 1) There are plenty of persistence layers which do this job much better.
>
> 2) I don't think this belongs in a driver.
> 3) The code will be simpler.
How do I do a database request via JDBC and save the result set to a
text file on the client computer? Isn't that what serialize is for? If
so I need it in the driver.(and instructions on how to get it to work
=:-b)
Cheers
Tony Grant
--
RedHat Linux on Sony Vaio C1XD/S
http://www.animaproductions.com/linux2.html
Macromedia UltraDev with PostgreSQL
http://www.animaproductions.com/ultra.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-10-05 14:22:14 | Re: Serialize |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-10-05 12:57:00 | Serialize |