Re: wCTE behaviour

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: wCTE behaviour
Date: 2010-12-22 20:54:08
Message-ID: 10016.1293051248@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Is this the patch of record? There are no changes to the documentation
>> included.

> I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched
> it in a very long time. I will work on the documentation if there's a
> chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1. This arrangement makes
> more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree.

Well, it's difficult to review a documentation-free patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-12-22 21:17:04 Re: How much do the hint bits help?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-22 20:08:01 Re: How much do the hint bits help?