| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: meson: Non-feature feature options |
| Date: | 2023-03-03 09:16:09 |
| Message-ID: | 0fff0827-c1f5-d29c-2ee3-dc8c871176bf@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02.03.23 11:41, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> I am kind of confused. I added these checks for considering other SSL
> implementations in the future, for this reason I have two nested if
> checks. The top one is for checking if we need to search an SSL
> library and the nested one is for checking if we need to search this
> specific SSL library. What do you think?
I suppose that depends on how you envision integrating other SSL
libraries into this logic. It's not that important right now; if the
structure makes sense to you, that's fine.
Please send an updated patch with the small changes that have been
mentioned.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Önder Kalacı | 2023-03-03 09:32:39 | Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-03-03 09:10:15 | Re: Add documentation for coverage reports with meson |