| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL procedures |
| Date: | 2017-11-08 17:03:46 |
| Message-ID: | 0fc4d2b7-7d2a-057f-dd80-40ef0081e491@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/8/17 11:11, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have already submitted a separate patch that addresses these questions.
>
> Maybe I'm obtuse, but I'm not seeing it? In very interested in the
> general approach to transaction management; if you've described it in
> the patch I'll read it there. Thanks for doing this.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/178d3380-0fae-2982-00d6-c43100bc8748@2ndquadrant.com
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2017-11-08 17:15:02 | Re: SQL procedures |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-08 17:02:40 | Re: Small improvement to compactify_tuples |