From: | Frank Millman <frank(at)chagford(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Slow SELECT |
Date: | 2020-05-26 07:22:49 |
Message-ID: | 0fb25867-78d2-d57f-134a-c3fccac7bbde@chagford.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi all
I have a SELECT that runs over 5 times slower on PostgreSQL compared
with Sql Server and sqlite3. I am trying to understand why.
I have a table that looks like this (simplified) -
CREATE TABLE my_table (
row_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
deleted_id INT DEFAULT 0,
fld_1 INT REFERENCES table_1(row_id),
fld_2 INT REFERENCES table_2(row_id),
fld_3 INT REFERENCES table_3(row_id),
fld_4 INT REFERENCES table_4(row_id),
tran_date DATE,
tran_total DEC(21,2)
);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX my_table_ndx ON my_table (fld_1, fld_2, fld_3,
fld_4, tran_date) WHERE deleted_id = 0;
The table sizes are -
my_table : 167 rows
table_1 : 21 rows
table_2 : 11 rows
table_3 : 3 rows
table_4 : 16 rows
Therefore for each tran_date in my_table there are potentially
21x11x3x16 = 11088 rows. Most will be null.
I want to select the row_id for the last tran_date for each of those
potential groups. This is my select -
SELECT (
SELECT a.row_id FROM my_table a
WHERE a.fld_1 = b.row_id
AND a.fld_2 = c.row_id
AND a.fld_3 = d.row_id
AND a.fld_4 = e.row_id
AND a.deleted_id = 0
ORDER BY a.tran_date DESC LIMIT 1
)
FROM table_1 b, table_2 c, table_3 d, table_4 e
Out of 11088 rows selected, 103 are not null.
On identical data, this takes 0.06 sec on SQL Server, 0.04 sec on
sqlite3, and 0.31 sec on PostgreSQL.
I have looked at the EXPLAIN, but I don't really know what to look for.
I can supply it if that would help.
Thanks for any advice.
Frank Millman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Olivier Gautherot | 2020-05-26 07:32:14 | Re: Slow SELECT |
Previous Message | Christopher Pereira | 2020-05-26 03:59:43 | Re: pg_basebackup + incremental base backups |