Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-04-12 13:12:23
Message-ID: 0f547b0d-59e9-48d0-9d49-acea51790b92@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Clift wrote:
> Simon included a short starter list of potentials which might be in
> that category:
>
> * SQL compliant identifiers
> * Remove RULEs
> * Change recovery.conf
> * Change block headers
> * Retire template0, template1
> * Optimise FSM
> * Add heap metapage
> * Alter tuple headers
> et al

+ CMake build I think.

Now I can build:
* postgres
* bin/* programs
* pl/* languages
* contrib/* (with cmake PGXS analogue)

Can run regression and isolation tests for postgres/pl* and all contrib
modules.

There is still a lot of work but I hope everything will turn out. Also it
would be good to get help.

Thanks.

PS https://github.com/stalkerg/postgres_cmake

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-04-12 13:15:21 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring.
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-04-12 13:11:28 Re: Choosing parallel_degree