Re: POSTGRES/MYSQL

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sonam Sharma <sonams1209(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POSTGRES/MYSQL
Date: 2019-03-11 19:20:20
Message-ID: 0f0da615-a677-ff82-9a0a-508b4eb30db7@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/03/2019 05:35, Michael Nolan wrote:
[...]
>  MySQL is better at isolating users from each other and requires less
> expertise to administer.

[...]

I keep reading that MySQL is easier to administer, but never seen any
evidence of that.  And in my very limited experience of both, I've found
PostgreSQL easier to set up & administer.

From what I've read about problems with MySQL, I think that if you
value your data, just don't use MySQL.   At least 4 times, since 2001,
I've searched for PostgreSQL vs MySQL comparisons, and each time found
PostgreSQL to be superior in terms of performance, reliability,
robustness, and ease of use.

There is a definite trend of people moving from MySQL to PostgreSQL, and
its not just because of Oracle (MySQL diehards are moving to MariaDB).

I have a lot more confidence in PostgreSQL, than MySQL/MariaDB.

Cheers,
Gavin

P.S. Don't top post!  As commenting at the bottom, is the norm for
PostgreSQL mailing lists.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Fernández 2019-03-11 19:25:55 Upgrade standby after starting cluster using rsync
Previous Message Perumal Raj 2019-03-11 19:16:23 Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound