From: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sonam Sharma <sonams1209(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: POSTGRES/MYSQL |
Date: | 2019-03-11 19:20:20 |
Message-ID: | 0f0da615-a677-ff82-9a0a-508b4eb30db7@archidevsys.co.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/03/2019 05:35, Michael Nolan wrote:
[...]
> MySQL is better at isolating users from each other and requires less
> expertise to administer.
[...]
I keep reading that MySQL is easier to administer, but never seen any
evidence of that. And in my very limited experience of both, I've found
PostgreSQL easier to set up & administer.
From what I've read about problems with MySQL, I think that if you
value your data, just don't use MySQL. At least 4 times, since 2001,
I've searched for PostgreSQL vs MySQL comparisons, and each time found
PostgreSQL to be superior in terms of performance, reliability,
robustness, and ease of use.
There is a definite trend of people moving from MySQL to PostgreSQL, and
its not just because of Oracle (MySQL diehards are moving to MariaDB).
I have a lot more confidence in PostgreSQL, than MySQL/MariaDB.
Cheers,
Gavin
P.S. Don't top post! As commenting at the bottom, is the norm for
PostgreSQL mailing lists.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martín Fernández | 2019-03-11 19:25:55 | Upgrade standby after starting cluster using rsync |
Previous Message | Perumal Raj | 2019-03-11 19:16:23 | Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound |