| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: E-mail harvesting on PG lists? |
| Date: | 2006-01-10 20:42:31 |
| Message-ID: | 0f0a6c03785c01d4e498cd7b7ea7f1c4@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>> If you think that spammers are unable to do s/ (at) /@/ you're living in
>> a dream world.
> Agreed. I'd honesly rather we drop that nonsense so I can at least cut
> and paste email addresses when needed.
I'd rather not. While obfuscation is not a surefire solution, it does help.
Quite a bit, as spammers generally go for the low hanging fruit. I've done
tests on this, and the number of spams received is far higher for
unobfuscated email addresses.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200601101538
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFDxBv6vJuQZxSWSsgRAjHTAKCS3T2o1zPaZNESrUyrL9NZyuZgYgCg/GGW
XxaU+C1A4Ol7ggUsTg9SMno=
=zuf4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2006-01-10 22:21:01 | Re: Sequence Manipulation Functions |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-10 20:36:29 | Re: help with rules for system table |