Re: Fix error handling in be_tls_open_server()

From: Sergey Shinderuk <s(dot)shinderuk(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix error handling in be_tls_open_server()
Date: 2023-08-28 17:39:07
Message-ID: 0e4d5421-cf10-d400-bc36-6fd31611db5b@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.08.2023 18:12, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 6:25 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> LD_PRELOAD is the only thing I can think about, but that's very fancy.
>> Even with that, having a certificate with a NULL peer_cn could prove
>> to be useful in the SSL suite to stress more patterns around it?
>
> +1. Last we tried it, OpenSSL didn't want to create a certificate with
> an embedded null, but maybe things have changed?
>

To embed a null byte into the Subject, I first generated a regular
certificate request in the DER (binary) format, then manually inserted
null into the file and recomputed the checksum. Like this:
https://security.stackexchange.com/a/58845

I'll try to add a client certificate lacking a CN to the SSL test suite.

--
Sergey Shinderuk https://postgrespro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-08-28 17:51:18 PostgreSQL 16 RC1 release announcement draft
Previous Message Jelte Fennema 2023-08-28 16:51:02 Re: Support prepared statement invalidation when result types change