| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | phase out ossp-uuid? |
| Date: | 2019-02-07 08:26:14 |
| Message-ID: | 0e18f525-7205-53a4-6df2-3aa5c551a13d@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm wondering whether we should phase out the use of the ossp-uuid
library? (not the uuid-ossp extension) We have had preferred
alternatives for a while now, so it shouldn't be necessary to use this
anymore, except perhaps in some marginal circumstances? As we know,
ossp-uuid isn't maintained anymore, and a few weeks ago the website was
gone altogether, but it seems to be back now.
I suggest we declare it deprecated in PG12 and remove it altogether in PG13.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-02-07 08:30:38 | restrict pg_stat_ssl to superuser? |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-02-07 08:25:49 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |