Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster

From: "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Date: 2021-05-28 20:33:18
Message-ID: 0da29d18-8864-3e31-e2aa-21277bce6bff@mailpen.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On 2021-05-28 12:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 5/28/21 2:48 PM, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
>> [Reposted to the proper list]
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> Have you tried reproducing these results outside RDS, say on an EC2 instance running vanilla PostgreSQL?
>>
>> cheers, andrew
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Dunstan
>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

That is step #2 of my backup plan:

1.  Create an EC2 instance running community v9.6.  Once that is done
& running successfully, I'm golden for a long, long time.
2. If I am curious (& not worn out), take a snapshot of #1 & update it
to v13.

-- Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2021-05-28 20:37:41 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2021-05-28 20:23:06 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2021-05-28 20:37:41 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2021-05-28 20:23:06 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster