From: | Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
Date: | 2016-12-12 17:45:38 |
Message-ID: | 0d5b64c9-fa05-4dab-93e7-56576d1193ca@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Huh, this code is broken as well. We have to ignore partitions that don't
have any subpartitions. Patch is attached below (v2).
--
Dmitry Ivanov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
hacky_partitioning_hotfix_v2.diff | text/x-patch | 1.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-12 18:05:59 | Re: Nested Wait Events? |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-12-12 17:45:27 | Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches) |