Re: Ok, I lied about it working... TCP_NODELAY?

Is anonymous cvs on a time delay? I keep getting 1.172 of
configure.in from HEAD.

Should be 173
--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice
how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt
otherwise.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Ok, I lied about it working... TCP_NODELAY?

> Rod Taylor writes:
>
> > Configure worked, compile failed :)
> >
> > gcc -pipe -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
> > -I../../../src/include -c -o pqcomm.o pqcomm.c
> > pqcomm.c: In function `StreamConnection':
> > pqcomm.c:395: `TCP_NODELAY' undeclared (first use in this
function)
> > pqcomm.c:395: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > pqcomm.c:395: for each function it appears in.)
>
> That was among the additional fixes I mentioned. CVS update again.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>