Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

From: "Chad Thompson" <chad(at)weblinkservices(dot)com>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Date: 2003-05-02 20:53:33
Message-ID: 0c9a01c310ec$e5605d90$32021aac@chad
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Can WAL and the swap partition be on the same drive?

Thanks
Chad
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Chad Thompson" <chad(at)weblinkservices(dot)com>; "pgsql-performance"
<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

Chad,

> I realize that Im a raid on linux newbie so any suggestions are
appreciated.
> Im thinking I want to put this on an IDE Raid array, probably 0+1. IDE
seems
> to be cheap and effective these days.
> What ive been able to glean from other postings is that I should have 3
> drives, 2 for the database w/ striping and another for the WAL.

Well, RAID 0+1 is only relevant if you have more than 2 drives. Otherwise,
it's just RAID 1 (which is a good choice for PostgreSQL).

More disks is almost always better. Putting WAL on a seperate (non-RAID)
disk
is usually a very good idea.

> I would also appreciate raid hardware suggestions (brands, etc)
> And as always im not afraid to RTFM if someone can point me to the FM :-)

Use Linux Software RAID. To get hardware RAID better than Linux Software
RAID, you have to spend $800 or more.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-05-02 21:20:56 Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-05-02 20:10:46 Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)