Re: Code review in dsa.c

From: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code review in dsa.c
Date: 2023-01-16 06:57:55
Message-ID: 0c92fbb5-b42a-4b80-824f-74220a185a81@Spark
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

HI,

On Jan 16, 2023, 00:10 +0800, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:04:56AM +0800, Zhang Mingli wrote:
> > So, they are all dead codes, provide a patch to remove them.
>
> I am proposing a new use of dsa_create, dsa_attach, and dsa_get_handle in
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/4020/. These might also be useful for
> extensions, so IMHO we should keep this stuff.
>
> --
> Nathan Bossart
> Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
OK, thanks.

Regards,
Zhang Mingli

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-01-16 07:36:01 Re: recovery modules
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-01-16 06:40:50 Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply