Re: Separate GUC for replication origins

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Separate GUC for replication origins
Date: 2025-03-07 15:51:16
Message-ID: 0c3ae387-e9f2-4bde-b031-a78ce5ce3431@app.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025, at 11:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is that maximum active for the whole system, or maximum active per
> session, or maximum active per created origin, or some combination of these?
>

It is a cluster-wide setting. Similar to max_replication_slots. I will make
sure the GUC description is clear about it. It seems the Replication Progress
Tracking chapter needs an update to specify this information too.

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-03-07 15:56:41 Re: Add Postgres module info
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-03-07 15:49:44 Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit