Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql

From: "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
To: "Dean Rasheed" <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql
Date: 2016-02-09 16:14:06
Message-ID: 0c33d4ad-f268-4617-8ab5-2ea4896b37c0@mm
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed wrote:

> I don't think we should allow sorting colV values client-side,
> overriding a server-side ORDER BY clause in the query.

I shared that opinion until (IIRC) the v8 or v9 of the patch.
Most of the evolution of this patch has been to go
from no client-side sorting option at all, to the full range
of possibilities, ascending or descending, and in both
vertical and horizontal directions.

I agree that colV sorting can be achieved through the
query's ORDER BY, which additionally is more efficient
so it should be the primary choice.

The reason to allow [+/-]colV in \crosstabview is because
I think the average user will expect it, by symmetry with colH.
As the display is reorganized to be like a "grid" instead of a "list
with several columns", we shift the focus to the symmetry
between horizontal and vertical headers, rather than on
the pre-crosstab form of the resultset, even if it's the
same data.
It's easier for the user to just stick a + in front of a column
reference than to figure out that the same result could
be achieved by editing the query and changing/adding
an ORDER BY.

Or said otherwise, having the [+/-] colV sorting is a way to
avoid the question:
"we can sort the horizontal header, so why can't we sort the
vertical header just the same?"

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-02-09 16:17:07 Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-02-09 16:03:29 Re: Tracing down buildfarm "postmaster does not shut down" failures