| From: | Shinya Kato <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATEROLE and role ownership hierarchies |
| Date: | 2021-10-29 02:05:10 |
| Message-ID: | 0bedda530a5b6c39a0e25359cea2e247@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-10-29 01:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> The only intentional backward compatibility break in this patch set is
>> the the behavior of CREATEROLE. The general hope is that such a
>> compatibility break will help far more than it hurts, as CREATEROLE
>> does not appear to be a well adopted feature. I would expect that
>> breaking the behavior of the WITH ADMIN OPTION feature would cause a
>> lot more pain.
>
> Even more to the point, WITH ADMIN OPTION is defined by the SQL
> standard.
> The only way you get to mess with that is if you can convince people we
> mis-implemented the standard.
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
I now understand what you said.
--
Regards,
--
Shinya Kato
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-10-29 02:27:51 | Re: pg_receivewal starting position |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-10-29 01:54:31 | Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command |