From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "David Walker" <pgsql(at)grax(dot)com>, "David Wheeler" <david(at)wheeler(dot)net> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Boolean casting in 7.3 -> changed? |
Date: | 2002-11-30 21:01:39 |
Message-ID: | 0b8e01c298b3$ae62e580$6500a8c0@internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I didn't see an answer to this question, but I sincerely hope that the
> answer is
> "no." Otherwise, dynamic interfaces are going to have a much harder
> time.
>
> Take DBI (and DBD::Pg), for example. Most DBI users don't specify a
> data type when using placeholders. Therefore, DBD::Pg (and other DBDs,
> including DBD::Oracle) assume that the data types are strings. So it's
> not unusual for DBD::Pg to execute a query like this:
>
> INSERT INTO foo (numtype, varchartype, datetime, inttype)
> VALUES ('23.4', 'string', '2002-11-30 00:00:00', '12');
>
> In order to allow the flexibility to remain, AFAICT PostgreSQL has to
> continue to allow strings to be converted to numbers on the back end.
I have to agree with david on this one. It's essential that quoted numbers
be allowed into number fields. I have no problem with putting numbers in
boolean fields though.
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-11-30 21:11:20 | Re: [GENERAL] One SQL to access two databases. |
Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2002-11-30 20:51:14 | Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20 |