| From: | "Georg H(dot)" <georg-h(at)silentrunner(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: HDD vs SSD without explanation |
| Date: | 2018-01-15 18:32:27 |
| Message-ID: | 0b5a8964-132b-f41f-11d6-5cc6bf0cc551@silentrunner.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello Neto
Am 14.01.2018 um 21:44 schrieb Neto pr:
> Dear all
>
> Someone help me analyze the two execution plans below (Explain ANALYZE
> used), is the query 9 of TPC-H benchmark [1].
> I'm using a server HP Intel Xeon 2.8GHz/4-core - Memory 8GB HDD SAS
> 320GB 15 Krpm AND SSD Sansung EVO 500GB.
> My DBMS parameters presents in postgresql.conf is default, but in SSD
> I have changed random_page_cost = 1.0.
>
you are comparing a SAS Drive against a SATA SSD. Their interfaces serve
a completely different bandwidth.
While a SAS-3 device does 12 Gbit/s SATA-3 device is only able to
transfer 6 Gbit/s (a current SAS-4 reaches 22.5 Gbit/s)
Do a short research on SAS vs SATA and then use a SAS SSD for comparison :)
regards
Georg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Busch | 2018-01-15 19:46:56 | Re: HDD vs SSD without explanation |
| Previous Message | Neto pr | 2018-01-15 12:35:39 | Re: HDD vs SSD without explanation |