From: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations |
Date: | 2002-03-09 02:38:39 |
Message-ID: | 0b0e01c1c713$cc076fb0$b002000a@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something else
has to be going on...
--
Rod Taylor
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations
> Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which
was
> even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
> them dig through CVS).
>
> Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be created,
> it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the number
of
> other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges,
order
> of the creation among other things.
>
> Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
> POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.
>
>
> --
> Rod Taylor
>
> Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice
> how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
> opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever
felt
> otherwise.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-03-09 02:52:29 | Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-03-09 02:15:12 | Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations |