From: | "Thomas H(dot)" <me(at)alternize(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: planer picks a bad plan (seq-scan instead of index) |
Date: | 2006-11-09 12:41:58 |
Message-ID: | 0ad301c703fc$72d1c320$0201a8c0@iwing |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> OK - in that case try explicit subqueries:
>
> SELECT ... FROM
> (SELECT * FROM shop.dvds
> LEFT JOIN shop.oldtables.movies
> WHERE lower(mov_name) LIKE ...
> ) AS bar
> LEFT JOIN shop.data_soundmedia
same result, have tried this as well (22sec). it's the LEFT JOIN
shop.data_soundmedia for which the planer picks a seqscan instead of index
scan, no matter what...
>>> I'd also be tempted to look at a tsearch2 setup for the word searches.
>>
>>
>> tsearch2 doesn't work that well for exact matches (including special
>> chars). but the culprit here isn't the '%...'%' seqscan, but rather the
>> additional joined table (where no lookup except for the join-column takes
>> place) that makes the query going from 200ms to 24sec.
>
> Agreed, but I'd still be inclined to let tsearch do a first filter then
> limit the results with LIKE.
would be a way to probably speed up the seqscan on shop.dvds that takes now
200ms. unfortunately, tsearch2 is broken for me in 8.2 (filling tsearch2
tvector columns crashes backend). but thats a different story :-)
- thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Ollier | 2006-11-09 12:45:50 | Re: Table design - unknown number of column |
Previous Message | brian | 2006-11-09 12:41:03 | Re: [PL/pgSQL] How should I use FOUND special variable. |