From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: more parallel query documentation |
Date: | 2016-09-20 15:18:57 |
Message-ID: | 0a86b71d-7856-e4ef-a88f-08ccb3dd55e8@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/19/16 1:22 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I agree it should be added. I suggest that it could even be added to
>> the 9.6 docs, if you can make it.
>
> Here's a patch. I intend to commit this pretty quickly unless
> somebody objects, and also to backpatch it into 9.6. I'm sure it's
> not perfect, but imperfect documentation is better than no
> documentation.
Looks reasonable to me.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-09-20 15:20:35 | Re: Hash Indexes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-20 15:04:49 | Re: Use of SizeOfIptrData - is that obsolete? |