> On Apr 15, 2018, at 09:51, David Arnold <dar(at)xoe(dot)solutions> wrote:
>
> 1. Throughout this vivid discussion a good portion of support has already been manifested for the need of a more structured (machine readable) logging format. There has been no substantial objection to this need.
I'm afraid I don't see that. While it's true that as a standard, CSV is relatively ill-defined, as a practical matter in PostgreSQL it is very easy to write code that parses .csv format.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com