Re: t1000/t2000 sun-servers

From: Guido Neitzer <guido(dot)neitzer(at)pharmaline(dot)de>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: t1000/t2000 sun-servers
Date: 2006-03-06 21:24:29
Message-ID: 0EED23D8-4ECF-498B-8AF6-A453A0E34702@pharmaline.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 06.03.2006, at 21:10 Uhr, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:

> Like migrate all your postgresql databases to one T2000. You might
> see that your average response time may not be faster but it can
> handle probably all your databases migrated to one T2000.
>
> In essence, your single thread performance will not speed up on Sun
> Fire T2000 but you can certainly use it to replace all your
> individual postgresql servers in your organization or see higher
> scalability in terms of number of users handled with 1 server with
> Sun Fire T2000.

How good is a pgbench test for evaluating things like this? I have
used it to compare several machines, operating systems and PostgreSQL
versions - but it was more or less just out of curiosity. The real
evaluation was made with "real life tests" - mostly scripts which
also tested the application server itself.

But as it was it's easy to compare several machines with pgbench, I
just did the tests and they were interesting and reflected the real
world not as bad as I had thought from a "benchmark".

So, personally I'm interested in a simple pgbench test - perhaps with
some more ( > 50) clients simulated ...

cug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jignesh K. Shah 2006-03-06 22:11:29 Re: t1000/t2000 sun-servers
Previous Message Ragnar 2006-03-06 20:51:46 Re: Sequencial scan instead of using index