From: | "Lufkin, Brad" <brad(dot)lufkin(at)ngc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'scott(dot)marlowe'" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | 'psql' <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query Time |
Date: | 2003-08-13 20:21:02 |
Message-ID: | 0E253E40DC78F4499CEDDE9223099F430706B7CD@xcgva040.northgrum.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Thanks for the info. Still, I'm surprised that a limited query would take 90
seconds.
-----Original Message-----
From: scott.marlowe [mailto:scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:20 PM
To: Lufkin, Brad
Cc: 'psql'
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Query Time
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Lufkin, Brad wrote:
> I'm running the following query:
>
> SELECT * FROM someTable LIMIT 20
>
> I turned on explain analyze (tip #8!) and was told that the query plan was
> sequential (no surprise there) with an estimated cost of between 0.00 and
> 1.07. Surprisingly, the actual time was around 90000 msec (or
one-and-a-half
> minutes). What's going on?
costs are estimated as a percentage of a cost of a single page access in
sequential mode. I.e. a single sequential page access is assumed to cost
1.0, and everything is relative to that. The cost numbers do NOT
translate directly into any time unit.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-13 20:29:05 | Re: Query Time |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-08-13 20:19:43 | Re: Query Time |