Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Date: 2024-05-16 21:53:17
Message-ID: 0DA6D676-D2DA-434C-94AA-F38DD6DC23AF@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 16 May 2024, at 23:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> At this point it seems like there's consensus to have a "parking"
> section of the CF app, separate from the time-boxed CFs, and I hope
> somebody will go make that happen. But I don't think that's our only
> issue, so we need to keep thinking about what should be improved.

Pulling in the information from the CFBot regarding test failures and whether
the patch applies at all, and automatically altering the state to WOA for at
least the latter category would be nice. There's likely to be more analysis we
can do on the thread to measure "activity/hotness", but starting with the
simple boolean data we already have could be a good start.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2024-05-16 22:00:23 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-05-16 21:46:27 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose