Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: Haris Peco <snpe(at)snpe(dot)co(dot)yu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index
Date: 2006-04-09 04:48:55
Message-ID: 0D7FD2FC-8B32-44B2-9599-84DD9A81DA03@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Apr 9, 2006, at 13:33 , Haris Peco wrote:

> create index test.test_name on test.test(name)
>
> schema prefix in 'create index'
>
> I know that it isn't necessary, because postgreSQL know that index
> is (must be)
> in table's schema, but this is natural for sql writers

Allowing a schema-qualified name for CREATE INDEX implies that there
is a choice of schema you could choose. By disallowing the schema, it
makes developers aware of the limitation of where the index can be
created. If the schema was allowed, some people would infer that they
can place the index in a schema other than the schema the table
resides in, and they would get bitten when they try to do so.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ottavio Campana 2006-04-09 06:58:44 Re: how to document database
Previous Message Haris Peco 2006-04-09 04:33:35 Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index