Re: archive modules

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2021-11-22 17:58:01
Message-ID: 0CF39706-6952-49B1-987D-F012CDF5EEC4@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/19/21, 11:24 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> I went ahead and split the patch into 4 separate patches in an effort
> to ease review. 0001 just refactors the shell archiving logic to its
> own file. 0002 introduces the archive modules infrastructure. 0003
> introduces the basic_archive test module. And 0004 is the docs.

Here is a rebased patch set (1b06d7b broke v10).

Nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v11-0004-Add-documentation-for-archive-modules.patch application/octet-stream 26.4 KB
v11-0003-Add-test-archive-module.patch application/octet-stream 9.2 KB
v11-0002-Introduce-archive-modules-infrastructure.patch application/octet-stream 10.7 KB
v11-0001-Refactor-shell-archive-function-to-its-own-file.patch application/octet-stream 8.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-11-22 19:17:01 Re: pg_ls_tmpdir to show directories and shared filesets (and pg_ls_*)
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2021-11-22 17:43:34 Re: Is a function to a 1-component record type undeclarable?