Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements
Date: 2021-11-03 10:35:31
Message-ID: 0C2F2801-9C88-4FD6-8164-4BF9ECFB7B83@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 15 Oct 2021, at 23:54, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:

> I scanned through the GUC list and found that the following parameters can
> potentially be categorized in the "special_disabled0" group, just for your
> reference.

This patch no longer applies, can you please submit a rebased version? Also,
do you have any thoughts on Cary's suggestion in the above review?

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-03 10:51:59 Re: CREATE ROLE IF NOT EXISTS
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-03 10:16:26 Re: remove internal support in pgcrypto?