Re: Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: a(dot)imamov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions
Date: 2024-02-27 08:24:25
Message-ID: 0C2ED37C-028B-4A0B-871F-C2289FDC706B@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 27 Feb 2024, at 06:08, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:28:51AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Yeah, I think this is for HEAD only, especially given the lack of complaints
>> against backbranches.
>
> Daniel, are you planning to look at that? I haven't done any detailed
> lookup, but would be happy to do so it that helps.

I have it on my TODO for the upcoming CF.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-02-27 08:30:04 RE: Have pg_basebackup write "dbname" in "primary_conninfo"?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-02-27 07:57:31 Re: Improve readability by using designated initializers when possible