RE: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connection fail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?

From: "Okano, Naoki" <okano(dot)naoki(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Dave Cramer' <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connection fail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?
Date: 2019-01-08 08:09:02
Message-ID: 0B4917A40C80E34BBEC4BE1A7A9AB7E2A844DF@g01jpexmbkw05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer [mailto:pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com] wrote:
> Pretty sure this was never intended to work.
>
>
> That said if you can provide a pull request we can look at implementing it.

Thank you for your reply!
I understand it does not work as intended.
So, I try to implement it and will send a pull request.

Regards,
Okano Naoki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2019-01-08 13:04:20 Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connection fail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2019-01-07 16:01:36 Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connection fail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?