Re: Getting a sample data set.

From: Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>
To: byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting a sample data set.
Date: 2011-01-18 19:28:07
Message-ID: 0A7F7B56-42FF-4079-8A8A-C394E02FBBC9@solfertje.student.utwente.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 18 Jan 2011, at 19:59, James B. Byrne wrote:

>
> On Tue, January 18, 2011 13:23, Alban Hertroys wrote:
>>
>>
>> Standard SQL alternatives tend to get complex, using self-joins to
>> weed out all the records you don't want (the exact term for such
>> joins escapes me right now, that would help with Googling if you're
>> looking for examples).
>
> Would the term be a grouped self join?

Nope, but some Googling put me on the right track. It's called a correlated subquery.

> I can see the motivation for something like DISTINCT ON. I take it
> that this syntax is peculiar to PostgreSQL?:

I suppose you meant particular? Yes, definitely. Although I'm sure some would find it peculiar as well :)

Alban Hertroys

--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.

!DSPAM:737,4d35e9d011708045415059!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2011-01-18 19:29:09 Re: Need help writing exclusion constraint
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-01-18 19:23:22 Re: Need help writing exclusion constraint