RE: Timeout parameters

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Robert Haas' <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>
Subject: RE: Timeout parameters
Date: 2019-03-15 02:08:34
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBC7BD8@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com]
> Now you might say - what if the server is stopped not because of
> SIGSTOP but because of some other reason, like it's waiting for a
> lock? Well, in that case, the database server is still functioning,
> and you will not want the connection to be terminated if no notifies
> are sent during the lock wait but not terminated if they are sent. At
> least, I can't see why anyone would want that.

Yes, so I think it would be kind to describe how to set socket_timeout with relation to other timeout parameters -- socket_timeout > statement_timeout > lock_timeout, for example.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2019-03-15 02:23:48 RE: Timeout parameters
Previous Message Imai, Yoshikazu 2019-03-15 01:38:22 RE: speeding up planning with partitions