| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby |
| Date: | 2018-09-21 06:26:19 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FAB4CCC@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz]
> I think that the description of wal_sender_timeout and its properties should
> remain where the parameter is defined, so (3) is not a good option in my
> opinion. (2) has a point with the use of quotes actually, so why not just
> mention options=''-c wal_sender_timeout=5000'' in the example of
> recovery.conf as you suggest and call it a day, but keep the paragraph I
> suggested in (1)?
Agreed. Sorry to cause you to take this long time for such a tiny patch...
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2018-09-21 06:57:43 | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-09-21 06:01:33 | Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby |