From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Dave Page' <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents? |
Date: | 2018-07-11 00:34:10 |
Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FA4C688@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org]
> SFLC have acted as the projects counsel in the past, so I'm not surprised
> they aren't talking to you; you won't be a known contact to them as a PG
> contributor, and as a Fujitsu employee there would likely be a conflict
> of interest for them to talk to you.
I see. Then I hope for some reply saying so so that I can give up my hope that I might get a good idea from them...
Who is a known contact to SFLC in PostgreSQL community? Can we expect response from SFLC if he/she contacts them?
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-11 00:37:54 | Re: _isnan() on Windows |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-07-11 00:29:43 | Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key |