From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Craig Ringer' <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a running backend |
Date: | 2017-12-12 04:25:54 |
Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F84C9AA@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Craig Ringer [mailto:craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com]
> TL;DR: Lets add a ProcSignalReason that makes a backend call
> MemoryContextStats when it sees it and a C func that users can use to set
> it on a proc. Sane?
> So how about borrowing a ProcSignalReason entry for "dump a memory context
> summary at your earliest convenience" ? We could name it a more generic
> "dump debug data" in case we want to add things later.
>
> Then a new pg_log_debug_backend(int) function or something like that could
> signal the proc and let CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS handle calling
> MemoryContextStats next time it's called.
+1
That's one of things I wanted to do. It will be more useful on Windows. Would it work for autovac processes and background workers, etc. that connect to shared memory?
I have also wanted to dump stack traces. Linux (glibc) has backtrace_symbols(), and Windows has StackWalk()/StackWalk64(). Is it sane to make the function a hook?
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-12-12 04:43:30 | Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a running backend |
Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2017-12-12 04:06:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage |