| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa(at)ut(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |
| Date: | 2017-04-26 07:33:27 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6EC883@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Masahiko Sawada
> The idea of changing the default value seems good to me but I'm not sure
> it's good idea to change the default value now under the circumstances where
> we're focus on stabilization.
> Also we should update the document as well.
>
We can consider like this: the OP found a usability problem as a result of PG 10 development, so we will fix it as a stabilization work.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2017-04-26 07:39:05 | Re: Cached plans and statement generalization |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-04-26 07:24:23 | Re: [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |