Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Thomas Munro' <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
Date: 2016-09-26 02:37:15
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5F1712@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Thomas Munro
> Another database vendor recommends granting SeLockMemoryPrivilege so that
> it can use large pages on Windows when using several GB of buffer pool.
> I wonder if that might help Postgres on Windows. This could be useful as
> a starting point to test that theory:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEepm%3D075-bgHi_VDt4SCAmt%2Bo_
> %2B1XaRap2zh7XwfZvT294oHA%40mail.gmail.com

Sorry for my late reply, and thank you. I've created a patch based on yours, and I'll submit it shortly in a separate thread.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-09-26 02:45:47 Supporting huge pages on Windows
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-09-26 02:32:18 Re: Stopping logical replication protocol