Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy
Date: 2016-05-30 08:01:27
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F57BC90@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Sorry I fail to understand what you mean with "legal"? Are you wondering
> about license restrictions? There are none.

Sorry, I just meant "correct" or "valid".

> As for compatibility, that's what major version numbers are for. This is
> not a PostgreSQL topic, but a general system one as for instance the same
> holds for libc.

Yes, but Windows users probably don't understand or know it. So, I suggested explicitly describing the application binary compatibility policy in the PostgreSQL manual. What do you think about it?

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-05-30 08:17:32 Re: foreign table batch inserts
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2016-05-30 07:51:07 Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy