From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem? |
Date: | 2016-03-07 06:30:47 |
Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F52DF91@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Mark Kirkwood
> For cloud - in particular Openstack (which I am working with ATM), the
> biggest thing would be:
>
> - multi-master replication
>
> or failing that:
>
> - self managing single master failover (voting/quorum etc)
>
> so that operators can essentially 'set and forget'. We currently use
> Mysql+ Galera (multi master) and Mongodb (self managing single master)
> and the convenience and simplicity is just so important (Openstack is a
> huge complex collection of services - hand holding of any one service is
> pretty much a non starter).
Yes, I was also asked whether PostgreSQL has any optional functionality like Galera Cluster for MySQL. He was planning a scalable PaaS service which performs heavy reads and writes. Demand exists.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2016-03-07 09:06:43 | Re: How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem? |
Previous Message | Ioseph Kim | 2016-03-07 01:05:33 | Re: Request Korean PostgreSQL User Group |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-07 06:38:40 | Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-07 06:25:12 | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |