| From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Lenorovitz, Joel" <Joel(dot)Lenorovitz(at)usap(dot)gov>, Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replication choices |
| Date: | 2007-01-31 22:12:06 |
| Message-ID: | 0A289175-4DA8-41AA-B5EF-B804DEDDD76C@event-s.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 31.01.2007, at 14:53, Lenorovitz, Joel wrote:
> I do not know of any product, Slony included, that has built in
> support
> for a situation such as this, so I suspect all of the details will
> have
> to be handled in a custom fashion.
It is not relevant for you as your are using PostgreSQL (for good
reasons I believe - I use it too, but not exclusively), but from what
I have heard, the guys at FrontBase [1] have developed a solution
for such scenarios based on their own database engine. If you are
especially looking for such a product and if you are not bound to a
special db engine, you might want to talk to them.
The information about that is, as far as I know, not on their
website, so you might ask the customer support for that.
To make that clear: I have nothing to do with FrontBase and it
clearly has disadvantages and advantages compared to PostgreSQL. I'm
just a user, as I am for PostgreSQL. I use both of them (more often
PostgreSQL) and I always try to use the one that fits the situation
best. That's all and that's why I'm giving this information.
cug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ben | 2007-01-31 23:17:40 | Re: replication choices |
| Previous Message | Lenorovitz, Joel | 2007-01-31 21:53:52 | Re: replication choices |