| From: | "Gregory Wood" <gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Richard Welty" <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostGreSQL Replication question !! |
| Date: | 2003-02-17 19:22:09 |
| Message-ID: | 09f401c2d6b9$de32cc00$4f89ffcc@eng3 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> i'm about to start working on using dbmirror for a project. i'd say that
in
> its current state, it's not complete, but it can be persuaded to serve in
a
> useful way. it lacks conflict resolution,
Agreed, but it's meant to be one way, so...
> and it currently replicates one
> master to one slave (but can be coached into something more
comprehensive.)
Actually it handles multi-slave easily... that's why there's a "MirrorHost"
table. I'm currently replicating out to two slaves with no modifications.
> it also makes assumptions about the initial states of the databases
> involved replication.
Yes, which makes it a true pain in the ass to bring another slave online.
Greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-02-17 19:37:24 | Re: PostGreSQL Replication question !! |
| Previous Message | Richard Welty | 2003-02-17 18:38:06 | Re: PostGreSQL Replication question !! |