Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays

From: "Joe Nelson" <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com>
To: "Isaac Morland" <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Chapman Flack" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Developers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays
Date: 2019-10-21 18:03:07
Message-ID: 09894939-7f3b-412d-9840-bc6bd897cf94@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Is it possible to define the macro to be {} where supported and {0}
> where needed? Something like:

If it's being put behind a macro then *stylistically* it shouldn't
matter whether {} or {0} is chosen, right? In which case {0} would
be a better choice because it's supported everywhere.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-10-21 18:13:19 Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays
Previous Message Isaac Morland 2019-10-21 17:35:49 Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays