From: | Neil Tiffin <neilt(at)neiltiffin(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: strange behaviour of psql \e command |
Date: | 2016-01-01 18:23:50 |
Message-ID: | 0956AB69-5714-4C6C-9C71-02D2EDF089FD@neiltiffin.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I noticed, that psql's \e command doesn't worked for me complaining 'error
>> opening file'. I did research and found that following setting in joe's (if
>> I choose editor as joe) configuraton causes the problem:
>> -exask ^KX always confirms file name
>> That worked for decades :), so I'm wondering what was changed either in El
>> Capitan or psql code ?
>
> I don't recall that we've changed anything much at all about \e recently,
> so probably the way to bet is that the El Capitan update broke something
> :-(. Can anyone else confirm?
>
Seems to work fine for me with vi on OS X 10.11.2 (15C50) and VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Oct 27 2015 16:22:14) Compiled by root(at)apple(dot)com
Nell
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-01 19:06:06 | Re: Keyword classifications |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-01 17:14:11 | Re: strange behaviour of psql \e command |