Re: Groups and roles

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Groups and roles
Date: 2003-06-16 05:17:21
Message-ID: 091401c333c6$90afb000$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > 1. Do we want to someday allow groups to have groups as members? (Seems
> > reasonable to me.)
>
> I agree.

I think the other requirement of roles is that they are able to own objects.
ie. we need to allow groups to own objects.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-16 05:18:24 Re: ECPG CVS version problems
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-16 05:15:56 Re: security flaw